A couple of weeks ago, I spoke at the FundRaising Success Virtual Conference & Expo. My talk was called "25 Good Ideas for Improving Your Fundraising and One Bad Idea." (You can still see/hear this talk, as well as the good material from the conference until August 24 by registering here.)
Here's Idea #20: Leave off the teaser. Teaser-free envelopes out-perform those with teasers more often than not. I'm not the first to have noted this. Probably anyone who's done a lot of direct mail testing knows this.
A lot of people agree with Idea #20. (Not all my ideas get that warm a reception.) They really seem to enjoy it, talk about it, and pass it along.
But the reason many people give for the success teaser-free envelopes is this: A teaser doesn't work because makes a piece of mail look junky.
Now we can't know for sure why things work and don't work. But I'm pretty sure that particular reason is dead wrong.
Here's what makes me think that: I have seldom seen a nicer, more classy, more professional piece of direct mail out-perform a more junky piece. Time after time, junk beats class. Did I say "beats"? I should say junk kicks class's butt. Hands down, nearly every time.
Seriously, if you want to improve your results, make your mail uglier. That's how consistent that pattern is.
So I'm confident that a teaser-less envelope usually wins for some other reason than it looks less junky. My own explanation is that most teasers are lame. The typical teaser is basically like this:
WARNING! There is an appeal for money inside. It's a lot like all the other appeals for money you get. If you read it, you'll be uncomfortable until you either forget or write a check. Take your pick. Oh yeah: There are some free address labels inside too.
Nobody tries to write teasers like that. But that's how most of them come out.
Saying nothing at all is better than saying something lame.
But while you're at it, don't assume that the style you like is the style that works. It seldom is.
